4.5 Article

Serum cholesterol, haemorrhagic stroke, ischaemic stroke, and myocardial infarction: Korean national health system prospective cohort study

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 333, Issue 7557, Pages 22-25

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38855.610324.80

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate risk factors, such as heavy alcohol consumption, that might explain any increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke associated with low blood cholesterol. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Korea. Participants 787 442 civil servants (661700 men, 125 742 women) aged 30-64. Main outcome measures Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed at biennial health check. Data on morbidity and mortality were ascertained from 1990 to 2001 using hospital admissions and mortality surveillance systems. Results 6328 cases of ischaemic stroke (6021 men, 307 women), 3947 cases of haemorrhagic stroke (3748 men, 199 women), 3170 cases of undefined stroke (2902 men, 268 women), and 4417 cases of myocardial infarction (4305 men, 112 women) occurred. Ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction were strongly and positively associated With blood cholesterol (hazard ratio per 1 mmol/l cholesterol 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.24) and 1.48 (1.43 to 1.53), respectively). Haemorrhagic stroke showed an inverse association in fully adjusted models (0.91, 0.87 to 0.95). This inverse association was confined to participants with hypertension. When stratified by concentration of gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), an indicator of alcohol consumption, the association was not seen in participants with low concentrations of GGT, and it was independent of hypertension in those With high concentrations of GGT (> 80 U/l). Conclusions High alcohol consumption may underlie the association between low blood cholesterol and increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available