4.6 Article

Inferior parietal rTMS affects performance in an addition task

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 774-781

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70416-7

Keywords

acalculia; addition; problem size effect; inferior parietal lobe; angular gyrus

Funding

  1. MRC [G0300665] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0300665] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0300665] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies strongly suggest that the inferior parietal cortex is important for calculation. However, the evidence from neuroimaging experiments for a left hemispheric dominance in calculation is not as clear as one would expect from the studies of patients. Often a concomitant activation of the homologous. inferior parietal region of the right hemisphere is reported in the same tasks. The objective of this study was to replicate basic findings of acalculic patients and to investigate discrepancies between data from patients and results from neuroimaging studies in an addition task. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was applied over inferior parietal areas and the adjacent intraparietal sulcus (IPS) while subjects solved double-digit addition tasks. From studies of acalculic patients it was hypothesised that left hemispheric rTMS stimulation should result in longer reaction times (RTs) in the addition task. On addition trials without TMS subjects showed the classical problem size effect with longer RTs the larger the sum of the two operands. Magnetic stimulation over left inferior parietal areas disrupted performance significantly. The effect was specific to the left hemisphere stimulation. There was no increase in RTs for rTMS stimulation over the right hemisphere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available