4.0 Article

Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Hemodialysis Patients with Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Journal

ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 247-257

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12119

Keywords

hemodialysis hazards; sudden cardiac arrest; wearable cardioverter defibrillator; ESRD; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe survival outcome following a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in hemodialysis (HD) patients is poor regardless of whether an event takes place in or out of a dialysis center. The characteristics of SCA and post-SCA survival with HD patients using a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) are unknown. MethodsAll HD patients who were prescribed a WCD between 2004 and 2011 and experienced at least one SCA event were included in this study. Demographics, clinical background, characteristics of SCA events were identified from the manufacturer's database. An SCA event was defined as all sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) or asystole occurring within 24 hours of the index arrhythmia episode. The social security death index was used to determine mortality after WCD use. ResultsA total of 75 HD patients (mean age = 62.9 11.7 years, female = 37.3%) experienced 84 SCA events (119 arrhythmia episodes) while wearing the WCD. Sixty six (78.6%) SCA events were due to VT/VF and 18 (21.4%) were due to asystole. Most SCA episodes occurred between 09:00 and 10:00 (RR = 2.82, 95% CI [1.05, 7.62], P < 0.0001), followed by the 13:00-14:00 time interval (RR = 2.22, 95% CI [0.79, 6.21], P = 0.006). Acute 24-hour survival was 70.7% for all SCA events; 30-day and 1-year survival were 50.7% and 31.4%, respectively. Women had a better post-SCA survival than men (HR = 2.41, 95% CI [1.09, 5.36], P = 0.03). ConclusionsThe use of WCD in HD patients was associated with improved post-SCA survival when compared to historical data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available