4.5 Article

Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis- : A phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 56-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.002

Keywords

patient education; evidence-based medicine; multiple sclerosis; uncertainty; decision; decision making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study analysis the comprehension and emotional responses of people suffering from multiple sclerosis when provided with an evidence-based information module. It is a core module of a comprehensive decision aid about immunotherapy. The core module is designed to enable patients to process scientific uncertainty without adverse effects. It considers existing standards for risk communication and presentation of data. Methods: Using a mailing approach we investigated 169 patients with differing courses of disease in a before-after design. Items addressed the competence in processing relative and absolute risk information and patients' emotional response to the tool, comprising grade of familiarity with the information, understanding, relevance, emotional arousal, and certainty. Results: Overall, numeracy improved (p < 0.001), although 99 of 169 patients did not complete the numeracy task correctly. Understanding depended on the relevance related to the course of disease. A moderate level of uncertainty was induced. No adverse emotional responses could be shown, neither in those who did comprehend the information, nor in those who did not develop numeracy skills. Conclusion: In conclusion, the tool supports people suffering from multiple sclerosis to process evidence-based medical information and scientific uncertainty without burdening them emotionally. Practice implications: This study is an example for the documentation of an important step in the development process of a complex intervention. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available