4.3 Article

Plasma cerebrosterol and magnetic resonance imaging measures in multiple sclerosis

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 456-460

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.07.010

Keywords

biomarkers; neurodegeneration; neuroinflammation; magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; oxysterols

Funding

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society [748, 835] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The concentration in plasma of the brain-specific cholesterol metabolite cerebrosterol has been proposed as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neurological diseases. It is unknown, however, which pathophysiological process in MS best accounts for variations in plasma cerebrosterol. Patients and methods: In this study, we related plasma cerebrosterol concentrations in 46 MS patients -27 with a relapsing-remitting (RR) disease course and 19 with a primary progressive (PP) course-to three conventional magnetic resonance imaging measures: on T(1)-weighted brain scans, volume of gadolinium-enhanced lesions (a marker of active inflammation) and hypointense lesions (a marker of edema or axonal loss) and on T(2)-weighted scans, volume of hyperintense lesions (a marker of disease extent). Results: By multiple-regression analysis, we uncovered negative correlations between the cerebrosterol-cholesterol ratio in plasma and both age at sampling (beta = -0.35 and p = 0.079 in RRMS; beta = -0.76 and p = 0.006 in PPMS) and volume of T(2)-weighted lesions (beta = -0.52 and p = 0.078 in RRMS; beta = -0.50 and p = 0.247 in PPMS). Conclusion: We hypothesize that decreases in plasma cerebrosterol may reflect the total spatiotemporal burden of MS-the cumulative effects of its dissemination in space and its duration in time. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available