4.7 Article

Phase II multicenter study of neoadjuvant biochemotherapy for patients with stage III malignant melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages 3157-3163

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5344

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA046934] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine the relapse-free survival, overall survival, and response rate of patients with stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant biochemotherapy in a multicenter setting. Patients and Methods Patients with pathologically proven stage III melanoma, either via clinical detection or sentinel lymph node positivity, were eligible for enrollment. Patients received two cycles of preoperative biochemotherapy followed by complete regional lymphadenectomy and two postoperative courses of biochemotherapy. The biochemotherapy regimen consisted of the following: cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 4, dacarbazine 800 mg/m(2) on day I only, vinblastine 1.6 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 4, interleukin-2 total dose of 36 MU/m(2) during 4 days, and interferon alfa 5 MU/m(2) on days 1 to 5. Growth factor support was administered with each cycle. Results Ninety-two patients were eligible for the study. At a median follow-up of 40.4 months, relapse-free survival and overall survival are 64% and 78%, respectively. There was a lower relapse rate and improved survival for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node compared with patients with clinically detected lymph nodes, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Of the 50 patients with measurable disease, the overall response rate was 26%. Toxicity of the biochemotherapy was high but generally manageable. Conclusion The current study has expanded the preliminary evidence on neoadjuvant biochemotherapy for stage III melanoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available