4.5 Article

Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 978-985

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0106-1

Keywords

epidemiology; incidence; osteoporosis; prevalence; vertebral fracture

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-27065, AR-30582] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Approaches for recognizing vertebral fractures remain controversial. Methods: An age-stratified population sample of 512 postmenopausal women was followed with serial radiographs for up to 12 years (4455 person-years). Results: 112 women experienced a new vertebral fracture (20% reduction in any vertebral height from baseline) within this study period, for an annual age-adjusted (to US white women >= 50 years of age in 2000) incidence of 23 per 1000. Depending on the morphometric definition used, the prevalence of vertebral deformities at baseline ranged from 3 to 90%. A recent method to standardize vertebral heights produced the best agreement with a qualitative clinical reading of the films [kappa (kappa), 0.53]. Almost all of the different baseline definitions predicted future vertebral fractures, but most of the predictive power was attributable to the severe (e.g., 4 SD) deformities included within more generous (e.g., 3 SD) classifications. Whereas the generous definitions were more sensitive, and the restrictive ones more specific, their overall abilities to predict a new vertebral fracture were roughly comparable as evaluated by the c-index (analogous to the area under an ROC curve). Conclusions: This result suggests that the choice of a morphometry definition depends on the particular application and, in particular, on whether it is more important to maximize sensitivity or specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available