4.7 Article

Glut1 deficiency syndrome and erythrocyte glucose uptake assay

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 996-1005

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22640

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Colleen Giblin Foundation
  2. Will Foundation
  3. Milestones for Children
  4. USPHS (NINDS, DCD) [5RO1NS37949]
  5. Irving Center for Clinical Research at Columbia University
  6. NINDS [5RO1 NS37949]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The Glut1 deficiency syndrome (Glut1 DS) phenotype has expanded dramatically since first described in 1991. Hypoglycorrhachia and decreased erythrocyte 3-OMG uptake are confirmatory laboratory biomarkers. The objective is to expand previous observations regarding the diagnostic value of the uptake assay. Methods: One hundred and nine suspected cases of Glut-1 DS were studied. All cases had a consistent clinical picture and hypoglycorrhachia. The uptake assay was decreased in 74 cases (group 1) and normal in 35 cases (group 2). We identified disease-causing mutations in 70 group 1 patients (95%) and one group 2 patient (3%). Results: The cut-off for an abnormally low uptake value was increased from 60% to 74% with a corresponding sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 100%. The correlation between the uptake values for the time-curve and the kinetic concentration curve were strongly positive (R-2 = 0.85). Significant group differences were found in CSF glucose and lactate values, tone abnormalities, and degree of microcephaly. Group 2 patients were less affected in all domains. We also noted a significant correlation between the mean erythrocyte 3-OMG uptake and clinical severity (R-2 = 0.94). Interpretation: These findings validate the erythrocyte glucose uptake assay as a confirmatory functional test for Glut1 DS and as a surrogate marker for GLUT1 haploinsufficiency. ANN NEUROL 2011; 70: 996-1005

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available