4.7 Article

Microstructural and chemical effects of wet/dry cycling on pulp fiber-cement composites

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1240-1251

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.020

Keywords

degradation; durability; EDX; fiber reinforcement; SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microstructural and chemical mechanisms responsible for pulp fiber-cement composite degradation during wet/dry cycling are being investigated through environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and mechanical testing. Based on these results, a three-part progressive degradation mechanism for cast-in-place kraft pulp fiber-cement composites is proposed, which involves: (1) initial fiber-cement or fiber interlayer debonding, (2) reprecipitation of needle-like or sheath-like ettringite within the void space at the former fiber-cement interface or between the S1 and S2 fiber layers, and (3) fiber mineralization due to reprecipitation of calcium hydroxide filling the spaces within the fiber cell wall structure. This investigation also revealed that kraft pulp fibers exhibit poor resistance to degradation due to their inferior dimensional stability, as compared to thermomechanical pulp (TMP) fibers. TMP fibers contain significant amounts of lignin, which is alkali sensitive. Despite this, TMP fiber-cement composite exhibit improved resistance to degradation during wet/dry cycling. It is proposed that this improvement in durability may be attributed to the presence of lignin in the cell wall restricting fiber dimensional changes during wetting and drying, and hence, minimizing fiber-cement debonding. Additionally, it is proposed that lignin acts as physical barrier to calcium hydroxide formation within the fiber cell wall, minimizing fiber mineralization of TMP fibers. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available