4.8 Article

Heavy metal stress and sulfate uptake in maize roots

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages 1138-1148

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.076240

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ZmST1;1, a putative high-affinity sulfate transporter gene expressed in maize (Zea mays) roots, was functionally characterized and its expression patterns were analyzed in roots of plants exposed to different heavy metals (Cd, Zn, and Cu) interfering with thiol metabolism. The ZmST1;1 cDNA was expressed in the yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae) sulfate transporter mutant CP154-7A. Kinetic analysis of sulfate uptake isotherm, determined on complemented yeast cells, revealed that ZmST1;1 has a high affinity for sulfate (K-m value of 14.6 +/- 0.4 mu M). Cd, Zn, and Cu exposure increased both ZmST1;1 expression and root sulfate uptake capacity. The metal-induced sulfate uptakes were accompanied by deep alterations in both thiol metabolism and levels of compounds such as reduced glutathione (GSH), probably involved as signals in sulfate uptake modulation. Cd and Zn exposure strongly increased the level of nonprotein thiols of the roots, indicating the induction of additional sinks for reduced sulfur, but differently affected root GSH contents that decreased or increased following Cd or Zn stress, respectively. Moreover, during Cd stress a clear relation between the ZmST1; 1 mRNA abundance increment and the entity of the GSH decrement was impossible to evince. Conversely, Cu stress did not affect nonprotein thiol levels, but resulted in a deep contraction of GSH pools. Our data suggest that during heavy metal stress sulfate uptake by roots may be controlled by both GSH-dependent or -independent signaling pathways. Finally, some evidence suggesting that root sulfate availability in Cd-stressed plants may limit GSH biosynthesis and thus Cd tolerance are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available