4.7 Article

Normal human fibroblasts exposed to high- or low-dose ionizing radiation: Differential effects on mitochondrial protein import and membrane potential

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
Volume 8, Issue 7-8, Pages 1253-1261

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1253

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1R01-CA92262-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [1R01 GM57067] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [0355710T, 0335473T] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How oxidative metabolism modulates effects of ionizing radiation is incompletely understood. Because mitochondria participate in oxidative metabolism, we investigated the modulation of mitochondrial protein import and membrane potential (Delta Psi) in irradiated cells. Our data show that effects at low dose cannot be predicted from effects at high dose. When density-inhibited normal human fibroblasts were exposed to a toxic dose of 4 Gy, protein import into mitochondria isolated from these cells was decreased. In contrast, protein import into mitochondria isolated from low-dose-irradiated (10 cGy) cells was enhanced, suggesting that mitochondria may play a crucial role in low-dose-induced adaptive responses. At high dose, import defects were not solely due to changes in mitochondrial Delta Psi, and modulation of import was not tightly linked to the cellular capacity to repair radiation damage. Another striking observation is that in proliferating nonirradiated cells, mitochondrial protein import and Delta Psi were regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner, being lower in S phase than in G(1). Interestingly, when quiescent G(0)/G(1) phase cells exposed to high-dose radiation were stimulated to proliferate, events associated with S phase, but not G(1), significantly affected import. The strategy described here may serve as novel end points to study radiation-induced effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available