4.6 Article

Testing grain surface chemistry: a survey of deuterated formaldehyde and methanol in low-mass class 0 protostars

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 453, Issue 3, Pages 949-U30

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054476

Keywords

ISM : abundances; ISM : molecules; stars : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Despite the low cosmic abundance of deuterium (D/H similar to 10(-5)), high degrees of deuterium fractionation in molecules are observed in star-forming regions with enhancements that can reach 13 orders of magnitude, a level that current models have difficulty accounting for. Aims. Multi-isotopologue observations are a very powerful constraint for chemical models. The aim of our observations is to understand the processes that form the observed high abundances of methanol and formaldehyde in low-mass protostellar envelopes (gas-phase processes? chemistry on the grain surfaces?), as well as to better constrain the chemical models. Methods. With the IRAM 30 m single-dish telescope, we observed deuterated formaldehyde (HDCO and D2CO) and methanol (CH2DOH, CH3OD, and CHD2OH) towards a sample of seven low-mass class 0 protostars. Using population diagrams, we then derived the fractionation ratios of these species (abundance ratio between the deuterated molecule and its main isotopologue) and compared them to the predictions of grain chemistry models. Results. These protostars show a similar level of deuteration as in IRAS 16293-2422, where doubly-deuterated methanol - and even triply-deuterated methanol - were first detected. Our observations point to the formation of methanol on the grain surfaces, while formaldehyde formation cannot be fully pinned down. While none of the scenarii can be excluded (gas-phase or grain chemistry formation), they both seem to require abstraction reactions to reproduce the observed fractionations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available