4.6 Article

Pulsed electrodeposition of nanocrystalline Cu-Ni alloy films and evaluation of their characteristic properties

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 60, Issue 16, Pages 1990-1995

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.065

Keywords

pulse plating; electrodeposition; nanocrystalline; Cu-Ni alloy films; magnetic properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preparation of nanocrystalline Cu-Ni alloy films by pulsed electrodeposition process and their structural, morphology, thermal characteristics and magnetic properties are addressed. The study reveals that the film composition, lattice constant and magnetic properties of the films could be controlled by the applied current density and duty cycle. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) confirms that the Cu-Ni alloy film has a stoichiometry of Cu0.98Ni0.02, Cu0.95Ni0.05, Cu0.89Ni0.11, Cu0.77Ni0.23, Cu0.56Ni0.44 and Cu0.38Ni0.62 that are obtained at 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 and 20 A/dm(2), respectively. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements confirm that all the six Cu-Ni alloy films of the present study possess the f.c.c. structure. The lattice constant is found to decrease with increase in nickel content of the Cu-Ni alloy. The crystallite size lies in the range of 15 to 46 nm for as-plated alloys and increases from 20 to 114 nm, following vacuum annealing at 400 degrees C for 1 h. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) trace indicates a broad exothermic peak characteristic of nanocrystalline materials. The vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) study reveals that, among the six types of Cu-Ni alloy films, the films obtained at 2.5 and 5.0 A/dm(2) are diamagnetic; the one obtained at 7.5 A/dm(2) is weakly ferromagnetic, whereas those obtained at 10, 15 and 20 A/dm(2) are ferromagnetic. The saturation magnetization increases with increase in nickel content of the Cu-Ni alloy film. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available