4.7 Article

Lower Motor Neuron Loss in Multiple Sclerosis and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 310-322

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21719

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Multiple Sclerosis Research (IMSF) Gottingen/Hertie Foundation
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB 507, SFB-TRR 43, SFB 650]
  3. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  4. European Union [EU5FP, QLK6-CT-2000-60042-44, QLK6-GH-00-60042-44]
  5. NMSS [1001-K-1, NS 08952, NS 11920]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered a chronic inflammatory and demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Evidence that axonal and neuronal pathology contributes to the disease is accumulating, however, the distribution of neuronal injury as well as the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully clarified. Here, we investigated the role of neuronal cell loss in MS and its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Methods: We performed electrophysiological investigations in MS patients, including assessment of compound muscle action potentials and motor unit numbers and quantified neuronal cell loss in human MS samples and different EAE models by high-precision stereology. Results: Both electrophysiological and morphological analyses indicated a massive loss of lower motor neurons in MS patients. We regularly found dying spinal motor neurons surrounded by CD3+ (CD4+ as well as CD8+) T cells expressing tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). We observed a similar degree of damage and immune attack in different variants of EAE; the lower motor neurons were preserved in adoptive transfer EAE induced with TRAIL-deficient T lymphocytes. Interpretation: Our study indicates that damage to lower motor neurons and TRAIL-mediated inflammatory neurodegeneration in the spinal cord contribute to MS pathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available