4.7 Article

Transcranial color Doppler study for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 751-757

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21384

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes (RCVS) are characterized by thunderclap headaches and reversible cerebral vasoconstrictions. No systematic studies on cerebral hemodynamics have been published. Methods: Patients with RCVS were consecutively recruited. Sequential transcranial color-coded sonography studies were performed on the middle cerebral artery (MCA) for 3 months. Mean flow velocities (V-MCA) and Linclegaard Index (LI) were recorded and compared with those of controls. Results: Thirty-two patients (all female; average age, 49.7 +/- 6.8 years) were enrolled. Four developed reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, and two of them, ischemic strokes. One hundred and twenty-six sonography studies were performed on 57 eligible MCAs. The mean maximum V-MCA (109.5 +/- 30:8cm/sec) and LI (2.2 +/- 0.7) of RCVS patients exceeded those of controls (V-MCA: 66.3 +/- 9.5cm/sec, p < 0.001; LI: 1.4 +/- 0.3, p < 0.001). The V-MCA and LI levels were still at their plateau at the mean time (day 22 after headache onset) of headache resolution. Fifteen (46.9%) patients had V,C, exceeding 120cm/sec, and 5 (16%) had LI exceeding 3. Patients fulfilling the criteria of subarachnoid hemorrhage mild vasospasm (n = 4; 13%), that is, both V-MCA greater than 120cm/sec and LI greater than 3, had a greater risk of posterior leukoencephalopathy (75 vs 4%; p = 0.003) and ischemic strokes (50 vs 0%; p = 0.01) than those without. Interpretation: Patients with RCVS experienced prolonged vasoconstriction, making the risk for posterior leukoencephalopathy and ischemic strokes Outlast headache resolution. Patients fulfilling mild vasospasm criteria for subarachnoid hemorrhage carry a high risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available