4.7 Article

Water vapor on supergiants:: The 12 μm texes spectra of μ Cephei

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 645, Issue 1, Pages 652-658

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/504287

Keywords

infrared : stars; stars : atmospheres; stars : individual (mu Cephei)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several recent papers have argued for warm, semidetached, molecular layers surrounding red giant and supergiant stars, a concept known as a MOLsphere. Spectroscopic and interferometric analyses have often corroborated this general picture. Here we present high-resolution spectroscopic data of pure rotational lines of water vapor at 12 mu m for the supergiant mu Cep. This star has often been used to test the concept of molecular layers around supergiants. Given the prediction of an isothermal, optically thick water vapor layer in local thermodynamic equilibrium around the star ( MOLsphere), we expected the 12 mu m lines to be in emission or at least in absorption but filled in by emission from the molecular layer around the star. Our data, however, show the contrary; we find definite absorption. Thus, our data do not easily fit into the suggested isothermal MOLsphere scenario. The 12 mu m lines, therefore, put new, strong constraints on the MOLsphere concept and on the nature of water seen in signatures across the spectra of early M supergiants. We also find that the absorption is even stronger than that calculated from a standard, spherically symmetric model photosphere without any surrounding layers. A cool model photosphere, representing cool outer layers, is, however, able to reproduce the lines, but this model does not account for water vapor emission at 6 mu m. Thus, a unified model for water vapor on mu Cep appears to be lacking. It does seem necessary to model the underlying photospheres of these supergiants in their whole complexity. The strong water vapor lines clearly reveal inadequacies of classical model atmospheres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available