4.5 Article

Functional reinnervation of the canine bladder after spinal root transection and immediate end-on-end repair

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1125-1136

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1125

Keywords

axon regeneration; cauda equina; motor neurons; neurogenic bladder; spinal injuries; ventral and dorsal root repair

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK043333, R01-DK43333] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS070267, R01 NS070267-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to transect and immediately repair ventral roots, selected by their ability to stimulate bladder contraction, to assess the feasibility of bladder reinnervation in a canine model. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was delivered via an osmotic pump (0.5 or 5 mg/mL) to a cuff surrounding the reanastomosis site to the two root bundles on one side. Electrodes were implanted bilaterally immediately proximal to the site of surgical reanastomosis. Results were compared to four root-intact, control animals that also received bilateral electrode implantation. At 6-12 months post-surgery, five of eight nerve transected and repaired animals showed increased pressure and bladder emptying during electrical stimulation of the repaired ventral roots contralateral to the BDNF delivery side. Nerve tracing studies one year postoperatively determined the repaired roots to be S1 and S2 and showed regrowth of axons from the spinal cord to nerve sites proximal to the repair site and to the bladder, and the presence of neurofilament-labeled axons growing across the ventral root repair site. In conclusion, transected ventral and dorsal roots in the sacral spine can be repaired and are capable of functionally reinnervating the urinary bladder. This feasibility study paves the way for future studies utilizing other more proximal motor nerves to bypass the transection site for bladder reinnervation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available