4.3 Article

Optimization of production conditions for β-mannanase using apple pomace as raw material in solid-state fermentation

Journal

ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 101-108

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-012-0449-0

Keywords

beta-mannanase; Apple pomace; Cottonseed powder; Response surface methodology; Solid-state fermentation

Funding

  1. 11th Five-Year Plan of National Science and Technology Support [2006BAD21B04-9, 2009BADA8B03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30840056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apple pomace is a wasted resource produced in China in large quantities, disposal of which has caused serious environmental problems. In order to make the best of this residue, apple pomace together with cottonseed powder was used as a raw material to produce beta-mannanase in solid-state fermentation (SSF) by Aspergillus niger SN-09. Optimization of fermentation conditions for maximizing beta-mannanase production was carried out using Plackett-Burman and Central Composite designs. A mixture of apple pomace and cottonseed powder (3:2, w/w) with 59.2 % (w/w) initial moisture, together with certain ionic compounds and salts, proved to be the optimal medium. The test fungi were inoculated in the optimized medium and incubated at 30A degrees C for 48 h. The activity of beta-mannanase reached 561.3 U/g, an increase of 45.7 % compared with that in basal medium, and reached the same level of production as that achieved using wheat bran and soybean meal as raw materials as in most factories in China. This is the first report of the use of apple pomace as a raw material to produce beta-mannanase in SSF. This will not only reduce the production cost of beta-mannanase, but also represents a new and effective way to make the best use of apple pomace, which can consequently help to reduce the environmental pollution caused by this waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available