4.6 Article

Effect of aerobic training on hot flushes and quality of life-a randomized controlled trial

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 616-626

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2011.583674

Keywords

Aerobic training; exercise; hot flushes; quality of life; randomized controlled trial

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation
  4. Juho Vainio Foundation
  5. Pirkanmaa Competitive Research Fund (Pirkanmaa hospital district)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective. To estimate whether aerobic training has an effect on frequency of hot flushes or quality of life. Design. A randomized controlled trial. Participants and setting. Symptomatic, sedentary women (n = 176), 43-63 years, no current use of hormone therapy. Intervention. Unsupervised aerobic training for 50 minutes four times per week during 6 months. Outcomes. Hot flushes as measured with Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL, SF-36), daily reported hot flushes on phone-based diary, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and body composition. Results. Intervention group had larger decrease in the frequency of night-time hot flushes based on phone diary (P for month x group = 0.012), but not on WHQ scale. Intervention group had less depressed mood (P = 0.01) than control women according to change in WHQ score. Changes in WHQ score in depressed mood (P = 0.03) and menstrual symptoms (P = 0.01) in the intervention group were significantly dependent on frequency of training sessions. HRQoL was improved among the intervention group women in physical functioning (P = 0.049) and physical role limitation (P = 0.017). CRF improved (P = 0.008), and lean muscle mass increased (P = 0.046) significantly in the intervention group as compared to controls. Conclusions. Aerobic training may decrease the frequency of hot flushes and improve quality of life among slightly overweight women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available