4.6 Article

A methodological approach for register-based evaluation of cost and outcomes in health care

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages S4-S13

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2011.586364

Keywords

Administrative registers; effectiveness; episodes of care; indicators; monitoring system; outcome and process assessment (health care); quality; record linkage; risk adjustment; performance assessment

Funding

  1. Finnish Academy
  2. Finnish Innovation Fund SITRA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. In health care, measures of performance are needed at producer level for improving the treatment processes and at system level for steering purposes. In addition, measures that enable reliable comparisons of producers with respect to each other should encourage them to develop their treatment processes to attain better positioning in benchmarking. Methods. The main innovation of the Performance, Effectiveness, and Costs of Treatment episodes (PERFECT) project is to measure performance using existing linkable information available from registers within well-defined care episodes in a whole population. Finnish health care and related registers are used for constructing the disease-specific databases, with rich content on treatment processes and complete follow-up data. Results. The PERFECT project has developed numerous performance indicators that can be used to evaluate health policy actions as well as to create regional and hospital-level benchmarking data. In PERFECT, the idea is to eliminate individual-level variation from the performance indicators by using individual-level data and proper risk adjustment methods. The focus of our interest is in the variation at the producer or regional level. Conclusions. Our experience shows that the utilization of population-level health care registers with an episode-of-care approach enables a continual system and producer-level performance measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available