4.7 Article

Fifteen-year results of a randomized phase III trial of fenretinide to prevent second breast cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1065-1071

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl047

Keywords

breast neoplasms; chemoprevention; fenretinide; clinical trial

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-72286] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The synthetic retinoid fenretinide administered for 5 years for prevention of second breast cancer showed no difference after a median of 8 years, but a possible reduction in premenopausal women. We conducted a long-term analysis in a subgroup of women who were regularly followed up in a single center. Patients and methods: We analyzed data after a median follow-up of 14.6 years (IQ range, 12.3-16.3 years) from 1739 women aged 30-70 (872 in the fenretinide arm and 867 in the observation arm), representing 60% of the initial cohort of 2867 women. The main efficacy endpoint was second primary breast cancer (contralateral or ipsilateral). Results: The number of second breast cancers was 168 in the fenretinide arm and 190 in the control arm (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.67-1.03). There were 83 events in the fenretinide arm and 126 in the observation arm in premenopausal women (HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.46-0.83), and 85 and 64 events in postmenopausal women (HR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.63-2.40). The younger were the women, the greater was the risk reduction associated with fenretinide, which attained 50% in women aged 40 years or younger and disappeared after age 55 (P-age*treatment interaction = 0.023). There was no difference in cancers in other organs, distant metastases or survival. Conclusions: Fenretinide induces a significant risk reduction of second breast cancer in premenopausal women, which is remarkable at younger ages, and persists several years after treatment cessation. Since adverse events are limited, a trial in young women at high-risk is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available