4.5 Article

Changes in dopamine levels and locomotor activity in response to selection on virgin lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages 610-617

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.02.004

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; lifespan; artificial selection; dopamine; locomotor activity; respiration rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among various other mechanisms, genetic differences in the production of reactive oxygen species are thought to underlie genetic variation for longevity. Here we report on possible changes in ROS production related processes in response to selection for divergent virgin lifespan in Drosophila. The selection lines were observed to differ significantly in dopmine levels and melanin pigmentation, which is associated with dopamine levels at eclosion. These findings confirm that variation in dopamine levels is associated with genetic variation for longevity. Dopamine has previously been implied in ROS production and in the occurrence of age-related neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, we propose a possible proximate mechanism by which dopamine levels affect longevity in Drosophila: We tested if increased dopamine levels were associated with a rate-of-living syndrome of increased activity and respiration levels, thus aggravating the level of oxidative stress. Findings on locomotor activity and oxygen consumption of short-lived flies were in line with expectations. However, the relation is not straightforward, as flies of the long-lived lines did not show any consistent differences in pigmentation or dopamine levels with respect to the control lines. Moreover, long-lived flies also had increased locomotor activity, but showed no consistent differences in respiration rate. This strongly suggests that the response for increased and decreased lifespan may be obtained by different mechanisms. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available