4.6 Article

Angiopoietin-2 levels as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 215-222

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07853890701779586

Keywords

angiogenesis; cardiovascular risk; myocardial infarction; prognostic; stroke; Tie-2 receptor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Abnormal angiogenesis is a pathophysiological component of cardiovascular disease (CVD), where circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis are associated with increased CVD risk in hypertension. We hypothesized that raised levels of angiopoietin (Ang)-1 and -2 would predict events in patients with hypertension treated for CVD. Methods. We measured angiopoietin levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 251 hypertensive participants (85% male; mean age 63.5 years-, 192 free of previous CVD events). Plasma angiopoietin levels were related to the subsequent CVD events over a mean follow-up period of 57.1 (SD 11) months. Results. There were 11 cases of myocardial infarction(MI) and 18 cases of stroke during follow-up. Ang-2 was a significant predictor of MI, stroke, and composite CVD events, with the greatest event-free survival amongst those in the lower tertile (all P < 0.05). Ang-1 was not predictive of CVD outcomes. Of CVD risk factors at recruitment (blood pressure, body mass index, plasma glucose, serum and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) -cholesterol), Ang-2 was the only discriminator of incident MI (area under curve (AUC)=73%, P=0.013), where a value > 4.3 ng/mL optimized specificity and sensitivity. On Cox regression analysis (CVD treatments and risk factors), raised Ang-2 was an independent predictor of MI, P < 0.05, but not stroke or composite outcomes. Conclusions. Among patients with hypertension, raised levels of Ang-2 were predictive of M1, and further study is warranted to evaluate the use of this biomarker in CVD management, risk stratification, and prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available