Journal
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages 171-+Publisher
AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/M13-1484
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health [T32DK007007]
- National Cancer Institute [U54 CA163262]
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [T32DK007007]
- National Cancer Institute Cancer Research Network [U24 CA171524]
- Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens [U54 CA163262]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) have been inconsistent. Purpose: To synthesize data about the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC and identify factors affecting its performance characteristics. Data Sources: Online databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, and bibliographies of included studies from 1996 to 2013. Study Selection: All studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk adults. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and critiqued study quality. Data Synthesis: Nineteen eligible studies were included and metaanalyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of FITs for CRC were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.86), 0.94 (CI, 0.92 to 0.95), 13.10 (CI, 10.49 to 16.35), 0.23 (CI, 0.15 to 0.33), respectively, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95% (CI, 93% to 97%). There was substantial hetero-geneity between studies in both the pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates. Stratifying by cutoff value for a positive test result or removal of discontinued FIT brands resulted in homogeneous sensitivity estimates. Sensitivity for CRC improved with lower assay cutoff values for a positive test result (for example, 0.89 [CI, 0.80 to 0.95] at a cutoff value less than 20 mu g/g vs. 0.70 [CI, 0.55 to 0.81] at cutoff values of 20 to 50 mu g/g) but with a corresponding decrease in specificity. A single-sample FIT had similar sensitivity and specificity as several samples, independent of FIT brand. Limitations: Only English-language articles were included. Lack of data prevented complete subgroup analyses by FIT brand. Conclusion: Fecal immunochemical tests are moderately sensitive, are highly specific, and have high overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting CRC. Diagnostic performance of FITs depends on the cutoff value for a positive test result.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available