4.7 Article

Cost-Effectiveness of Canine Vaccination to Prevent Human Rabies in Rural Tanzania

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 91-+

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/M13-0542

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U01 GM087719]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Multidisciplinary Parasitology Training Program [T32AI007404]
  4. Lindsay Fellowship for Research in Africa
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01 DA015612]
  7. National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health [DEB0225453, DEB0513994]
  8. Lincoln Park Zoo
  9. MRC [G0901135] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0901135] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The annual mortality rate of human rabies in rural Africa is 3.6 deaths per 100 000 persons. Rabies can be prevented with prompt postexposure prophylaxis, but this is costly and often inaccessible in rural Africa. Because 99% of human exposures occur through rabid dogs, canine vaccination also prevents transmission of rabies to humans. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rabies control through annual canine vaccination campaigns in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Design: We model transmission dynamics in dogs and wildlife and assess empirical uncertainty in the biological variables to make probability-based evaluations of cost-effectiveness. Data Sources: Epidemiologic variables from a contact-tracing study and literature and cost data from ongoing vaccination campaigns. Target Population: Two districts of rural Tanzania: Ngorongoro and Serengeti. Time Horizon: 10 years. Perspective: Health policymaker. Intervention: Vaccination coverage ranging from 0% to 95% in increments of 5%. Outcome Measures: Life-years for health outcomes and 2010 U.S. dollars for economic outcomes. Results of Base-Case Analysis: Annual canine vaccination campaigns were very cost-effective in both districts compared with no canine vaccination. In Serengeti, annual campaigns with as much as 70% coverage were cost-saving. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Across a wide range of variable assumptions and levels of societal willingness to pay for life-years, the optimal vaccination coverage for Serengeti was 70%. In Ngorongoro, although optimal coverage depended on willingness to pay, vaccination campaigns were always cost-effective and lifesaving and therefore preferred. Limitation: Canine vaccination was very cost-effective in both districts, but there was greater uncertainty about the optimal coverage in Ngorongoro. Conclusion: Annual canine rabies vaccination campaigns conferred extraordinary value and dramatically reduced the health burden of rabies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available