4.7 Article

Effect of compressive force on the expression of MMPs, PAs, and their inhibitors in osteoblastic Saos-2 cells

Journal

LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 575-583

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.01.040

Keywords

mechanical stress; matrix metalloproteinases; plasminogen activator inhibitor; plasminogen activators; tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone matrix turnover is regulated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and the plasminogen activation system, including tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1). We previously demonstrated that 1.0g/cm(2) of compressive force was an optimal condition for inducing bone formation by ostcoblastic Saos-2 cells. Here, we examined the effect of mechanical stress on the expression of MMPs, TIMPs, tPA, uPA, and PAI-1 in Saos-2 cells. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and with or without continuously compressive force (0.5-3.0g/cm(2)) for up to 24h. The levels of MMPs, TIMPs, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 gene expression were estimated by determining the mRNA levels using real-time PCR, and the protein levels were determined using ELISA. The expression levels of MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-14, and TIMP-1 markedly exceeded the control levels at 1.0 g/cm(2) of compressive force, whereas the expression levels of MMP-3, MMP-13, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, TIMP-4, tPA, uPA, and PAI-1 markedly exceeded the control levels at 3.0g/cm(2). These results suggest that mechanical stress stimulates bone matrix turnover by increasing these proteinases and inhibitors, and that the mechanism for the proteolytic degradation of bone matrix proteins differs with the strength of the mechanical stress. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available