4.6 Article

Using PA6 as a charring agent in intumescent polypropylene formulations based on carboxylated polypropylene compatibilizer and nano-montmorillonite synergistic agent

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 739-746

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.23973

Keywords

intumescent fire retardant; polypropylene; nano-MMT; nylon 6; carboxylated polypropylene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intumescent fire retardant polypropylene (IFP/PP) filled with ammonium polyphosphate (APP), melamine (M), and PA6 (charring agent) is discussed. Intumescing degree (ID) and the char yield were determined. Only when the three main components of IFR coexist at appropriate proportions, it has optimal ID and higher char yield. The appropriate proportion is PA6 : APP : M = 10 : 10 : 5. A new compatibilizer, carboxylated polypropylene (EPP), was added to PP/PA-6 blend. Flow tests indicated that the apparent viscosity increased with the addition of EPP, thermal characterization suggested that EPP has reacted with PA6, PA6-g-EPP cocrystallized with PA6, and EPP-g-PA6 cocrystallized with PP; SEM micrographs illustrated that the presence of EPP improved the compatibility of PP and PA6. All the investigations showed that EPP was an excellent compatibilizer, and it was a true coupling agent for PP/PA6 blends. Using PA6 as a charring agent resulted in the IFR/PP dripping, which deteriorated the flammability properties. The addition of nano-montmorillonite (nano-MMT) as a synergistic agent of IFR enabled to overcome the shortcoming. The tensile test testified that the addition of nano-MMT enhanced the mechanical strength by 44.3%. SEM showed that nano-MMT improved the compatibility of the composites. It was concluded that the intumescent system with nano-MMT was an effective flame retardant in improving combustion properties of polypropylene. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available