4.0 Article

Awareness of driving while sleepy and road traffic accidents:: prospective study in GAZEL cohort

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 333, Issue 7558, Pages 75-77

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38863.638194.AE

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To examine the association between self assessed driving while sleep), and the risk of serious road traffic accidents (RTAs). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting France. Participants 13 299 of the 19 894 living members of die GAZEL cohort, workers and recent retirees of a French national utility company followed up since 1989. Main outcome measures Frequency of driving while sleepy in the previous 12 months, reported in 2001; rate ratios for serious RTAs in 2001-3, estimated by using generalised linear Poisson regression models with time dependent covariates. Results The risk of serious RTAs increased proportionally with the frequency of self reported driving while sleepy After adjustment for graphic characteristics driving behaviour variables, work conditions, retirement, medical conditions mid treatments, depressive symptoms, and sleep disorders, the adjusted rate ratios of serious RTAs for participants who reported driving while sleep), in the previous 12 months a few times or once a month or more often were 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.0) and 2.9 (1.3 to 6.3) respectively compared with those who reported not driving while sleepy over the same period. These associations were not explained by any reported sleep disorders. Conclusions Self assessed driving while sleepy was a powerful predictor of serious RTAs, suggesting that drivers' awareness of their sleepiness while driving is not sufficient to prevent them from having RTAs. Messages on prevention should therefore focus on convincing sleepy drivers to Stop driving and sleep before resuming their journey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available