4.7 Article

Fossils of reionization in the local group

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 645, Issue 2, Pages 1054-1061

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/504404

Keywords

cosmology : theory; galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : halos; methods : numerical; stars : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use a combination of high-resolution gas dynamics simulations of high-redshift dwarf galaxies and dissipationless simulations of a Milky Way-sized halo to estimate the expected abundance and spatial distribution of the dwarf satellite galaxies that formed most of their stars around z similar to 8, evolving only little since then. Such galaxies can be considered fossils of the reionization era, and studying their properties could provide a direct window into the early, pre-reionization stages of galaxy formation. We show that similar to 5%-15% of the objects existing at z similar to 8 do indeed survive until the present in a Milky Way-like environment without significant evolution. This implies that it is plausible that the fossil dwarf galaxies do exist in the Local Group. Because such galaxies form their stellar systems early during the period of active merging and accretion, they should have a spheroidal morphology regardless of their current distance from the host galaxy. Their observed counterparts should therefore be identified among the dwarf spheroidal galaxies. We show that both the expected luminosity function and the spatial distribution of dark matter halos that are likely to host fossil galaxies agree reasonably well with the observed distributions of the luminous (L-V greater than or similar to 10(6) L-circle dot) Local Group fossil candidates near the host galaxy (d less than or similar to 200 kpc). However, the predicted abundance is substantially larger (by a factor of 2-3) for fainter galaxies (L-V < 10(6) L-circle dot) at larger distances (d greater than or similar to 300 kpc). We discuss several possible explanations for this discrepancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available