4.8 Article

Cost-effectiveness of defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in chronic stable heart failure - Results from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT)

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 135-142

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.581884

Keywords

amiodarone; defibrillators, implantable; heart failure, congestive; quality-adjusted life years; cost-benefit analysis

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [UO1 HL55496] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality rates compared with medical therapy alone in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure, whereas amiodarone had no benefit on mortality rates. We examined long-term economic implications of these results. Methods and Results - Medical costs were estimated by using hospital billing data and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Our base case cost-effectiveness analysis used empirical clinical and cost data to estimate the lifetime incremental cost of saving an extra life-year with ICD therapy relative to medical therapy alone. At 5 years, the amiodarone arm had a survival rate equivalent to that of the placebo arm and higher costs than the placebo arm. For ICD relative to medical therapy alone, the base case lifetime cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (discounted at 3%) were $38 389 per life-year saved (LYS) and $41 530 per quality-adjusted LYS, respectively. A cost-effectiveness ratio <$100 000 was obtained in 99% of 1000 bootstrap repetitions. The cost-effectiveness ratio was sensitive to the amount of extrapolation beyond the empirical 5-year trial data: $127 503 per LYS at 5 years, $88 657 per LYS at 8 years, and $58 510 per LYS at 12 years. Because of a significant interaction between ICD treatment and New York Heart Association class, the cost-effectiveness ratio was $29 872 per LYS for class II, whereas there was incremental cost but no incremental benefit in class III. Conclusions - Prophylactic use of single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy is economically attractive in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure with an ejection fraction <= 35%, particularly those in NYHA class II, as long as the benefits of ICD therapy observed in the SCD- HeFT persist for at least 8 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available