4.6 Article

Effect of human carbonic anhydrase II on the activity of the human electrogenic Na/HCO3 cotransporter NBCe1-A in Xenopus oocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 28, Pages 19241-19250

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M602181200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-30344, K01 DK082646, F32 DK075258] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P30-34989] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Others report that carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) binds to the C termini of the anion exchanger AE1 and the electrogenic Na/HCO3 cotransporter NBCe1-A, enhancing transport. After injecting oocytes with NBCe1-A cRNA (Day 0), we measured NBC current (I-NBC) by two-electrode voltage clamp (Day 3), injected CA II protein + Tris or just Tris (Day 3), measured I-NBC or the initial rate at which the intracellular pH fell (dpH(i)/dt) upon applying 5% CO2 (Day 4), exposed oocytes to the permeant CA inhibitor ethoxzolamide (EZA), and measured I-NBC or dpH(i)/dt (Day 4). Because dpH(i)/dt was greater in CA II than Tris oocytes, and EZA eliminated the difference, injected CA II was functional. INBC slope conductance was unaffected by injecting CA II. Moreover, EZA had identical effects in CA II versus Tris oocytes. Thus, injected CA II does not enhance NBC activity. In a second protocol, we made a fusion protein with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at the 5' end of NBCe1-A and CA II at the 3' end (EGFP-e1-CAII). We measured I-NBC or dpH(i)/dt (days 3 - 4), exposed oocytes to EZA, and measured I-NBC or dpH(i)/dt (Day 3 - 4). dpH(i)/dt was greater in oocytes expressing EGFP-e1-CAII versus EGFP-e1, and EZA eliminated the difference. Thus, fused CA II was functional. Slope conductances of EGFP-e1-CAII versus EGFP-e1 oocytes were indistinguishable, and EZA had no effect. Thus, even when fused to NBCe1-A, CA II does not enhance NBCe1-A activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available