4.6 Article

Antigen-experienced T cells limit the priming of naive T cells during infection with Leishmania major

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 2, Pages 925-933

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.925

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0400786] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI035914, AI 42370, R01 AI035914, AI 07518, R01 AI042370, R01 AI035914-13, T32 AI007518, AI 35914] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust [061343] Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [G0400786] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0400786] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One mechanism to control immune responses following infection is to rapidly down-regulate Ag presentation, which has been observed in acute viral and bacterial infections. In this study, we describe experiments designed to address whether Ag presentation is decreased after an initial response to Leishmania major. Naive alpha beta-Leishmania-specific (ABLE) TCR transgenic T cells were adoptively transferred into mice at various times after L major infection to determine the duration of presentation of parasite-derived Ags. ABLE T cells responded vigorously at the initiation of infection, but the ability to prime these cells quickly diminished, independent of IL-10, regulatory T cells, or Ag load. However. Ag-experienced clonal and polyclonal T cell populations could respond, indicating that the diminution in naive ABLE cell responses was not due to lack of Ag presentation. Because naive T cell priming could be restored by removal of the endogenous T cell population, or adoptive transfer of Ag-pulsed dendritic cells, it appears that T cells that have previously encountered Ag during infection compete with naive Ag-specific T cells. These results suggest that during L. major infection Ag-experienced T cells, rather than naive T cells, may be primarily responsible for sustaining the immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available