4.8 Article

Use of nitrocellulose membranes for protein characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 78, Issue 14, Pages 5102-5108

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac060344t

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR014662-01, S10 RR017990-01, S10 RR14662, S10 RR 017990] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK066491, R01 DK066491-03, DK52206, P01 DK052206, P01 DK052206-09, DK39753, R01 DK039753-13, R01 DK039753, DK66491] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P30 NS050276, P30 NS050276-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an improved method for MALDI-MS analysis of proteins that have been electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose (NC) membrane. With this approach, electroblotted proteins can be analyzed directly for intact molecular weight determination or after on-membrane digestion by dissolution of the nitrocellulose in MALDI matrix solution containing 70% acetonitrile and 30% methanol. This solution helps maintain solubility of proteins and peptides while dissolving the NC membrane, which is dissolved by 100% acetone in other protocols. On-membrane tryptic digestion using this method requires half the time of in-gel digestion and results in fewer missed cleavages and better protein coverage. For the membrane proteins studied, bovine uroplakins II and III, the protein coverage was almost twice that provided by conventional in-gel digestion, and the transmembrane domains of both uroplakins were detected only after on-membrane digestion. We also demonstrated the compatibility with MALDI-MS of a new dye, MemCode, which is specifically designed for staining NC membrane-immobilized proteins and is faster and more sensitive than Ponceau-S. Our improved on-membrane digestion protocol greatly improves the study of soluble and, particularly strikingly, integral membrane proteins by mass spectrometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available