4.7 Article

Near-relativistic electron c/v onset plots

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 646, Issue 1, Pages 634-641

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/504674

Keywords

interplanetary medium; scattering; Sun : particle emission; Sun : radio radiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is often assumed that the first arriving electrons of a near-relativistic (E > 30 keV) electron event are injected at the Sun impulsively and simultaneously at all observed energies and propagate scatter-free to 1 AU. In that case, a plot of the onset times T(0) versus c/v for various electron speeds v should yield the solar injection time T(inj) and the propagation distance D. In some electron events D similar to 1: 2 AU, but the inferred injection times are characteristically delayed by similar to 10 minutes after the start of metric/decametric type III radio bursts believed to be signatures of electron injection. The delays may indicate electron injections not directly associated with the type III bursts, but the delays could also result from gradual or energy-dependent injections or from significant coronal/interplanetary electron scattering, even for well-beamed events. These effects could invalidate the c/v plot analyses. We use Wind 3D Plasma and Energetic Particle (3DP) electron data to make c/v onset plots for 80 near-relativistic solar electron events to test for the consistency of the inferred values of D, which are found to be broadly distributed between 0.15 and 2.7 AU. In most cases D < 1 AU, an unphysical result partially due to instrumental effects in the high-energy 3DP detector, but also clearly inconsistent with the assumptions of impulsive and energy-independent injection onsets and scatter-free propagation of the electrons. We also discuss how previous results from c/v plot analyses have yielded contradictory and/or challenging injection results for the near-relativistic electrons as well as for gradual and impulsive solar energetic ion events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available