4.7 Article

Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages 3340-3346

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4692

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and the feasibility of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Patients and Methods The EGFR gene status in various tumor samples obtained from chemotherapy-naive advanced NSCLC patients was examined by DNA sequencing of EGFR exons 18 to 23. Patients harboring EGFR mutations received gefitinib (250 mg/d) alone. The response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile were assessed prospectively. Results Between June 2004 and October 2005, 75 patients were examined for the EGFR status, and 25 patients (33%) harbored EGFR mutations. EGFR mutations were significantly frequent in females (P <.01) and never or light smokers (P <.001). Sixteen patients with EGFR mutations were enrolled onto the study. The overall response rate in these patients was 75% (95% Cl, 54% to 96%), and the disease control rate was 88% (95% Cl, 71% to 100%). The median PFS time of these patients was 9.7 months (95% Cl, 7.4 to 9.9 months). No life-threatening toxicity was observed. Conclusion Treatment with gefitinib alone for chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations could achieve a high efficacy with acceptable toxicity. To assess the proper timing of gefitinib in such patients, a subsequent randomized trial comparing gefitinib with standard chemotherapy is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available