4.7 Article

Probing T Tauri accretion and outflow with 1 micron spectroscopy

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 646, Issue 1, Pages 319-341

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/504832

Keywords

planetary systems : protoplanetary disks; stars : formation; stars : pre-main-sequence; stars : winds; outflows

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a high-dispersion 1 mu m survey of 39 classical T Tauri stars ( CTTSs) veiling is detected in 80% of the stars, and He I lambda 10830 and P gamma line emission in 97%. On average, the 1 mu m veiling exceeds the level expected from previously identified sources of excess emission, suggesting the presence of an additional contributor to accretion luminosity in the star-disk interface region. Strengths of both lines correlate with veiling, and at P gamma there is a systematic progression in profile morphology with veiling. He I lambda 10830 has an unprecedented sensitivity to inner winds, showing blueshifted absorption below the continuum in 71% of the CTTSs, compared to 0% at P gamma. This line is also sensitive to magnetospheric accretion flows, with redshifted absorption below the continuum found in 47% of the CTTSs, compared to 24% at P gamma. The blueshifted absorption at He I lambda 10830 shows considerable diversity in its breadth and penetration depth into the continuum, indicating that a range of inner wind conditions exist in accreting stars. We interpret the broadest and deepest blue absorptions as formed from scattering of the 1 mu m continuum by outflowing gas whose full acceleration region envelopes the star, suggesting radial outflow from the star. In contrast, narrow blue absorption with a range of radial velocities more likely arises via scattering of the 1 mu m continuum by a wind emerging from the inner disk. Both stellar and disk winds are accretion powered, since neither is seen in nonaccreting WTTSs and among the CTTSs helium strength correlates with veiling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available