4.6 Article

Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 1207-1223

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.20124

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suppose we wish to recover a vector x(0) is an element of R-m (e.g., a digital signal or image) from incomplete and contaminated observations y = Ax(0) + e; A is an n x m matrix with far fewer rows than columns (n << m) and e is an error term. Is it possible to recover x0 accurately based on the data y? To recover x(0), we consider the solution x(#) to the l(1)-regularization problem min parallel to x parallel to l(1) subject to parallel to Ax - y parallel to e(2) < epsilon, where E is the size of the error term e. We show that if A obeys a uniform uncertainty principle (with unit-normed columns) and if the vector x(0) is sufficiently sparse, then the solution is within the noise level parallel to x(#) - x(0)parallel to e(2) <= C (.) epsilon. As a first example, suppose that A is a Gaussian random matrix; then stable recovery occurs for almost all such A's provided that the number of nonzeros of x0 is of about the same order as the number of observations. As a second instance, suppose one observes few Fourier samples of x(0); then stable recovery occurs for almost any set of n coefficients provided that the number of nonzeros is of the order of n/(log m)(6). In the case where the error term vanishes, the recovery is of course exact, and this work actually provides novel insights into the exact recovery phenomenon discussed in earlier papers. The methodology also explains why one can also very nearly recover approximately sparse signals. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available