4.8 Review

Cross-species annotation of basic leucine zipper factor interactions: Insight into the evolution of closed interaction networks

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1480-1492

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl022

Keywords

bZIP; dimer; transcription; DNA binding

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-78264] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-34814, NS-053187] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dimeric basic leucine zipper (bZIP) factors constitute one of the most important classes of enhancer-type transcription factors. In vertebrates, bZIP factors are involved in many cellular processes, including cell survival, learning and memory, cancer progression, lipid metabolism, and a variety of developmental processes. These factors have the ability to homo-dimerize and heterodimerize in a specific and predictable manner, resulting in hundreds of dimers with unique effects on transcription. In recent years, several studies have described dimerization preferences for bZIP factors from different species, including Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, these findings are summarized as novel, graphical representations of closed, interacting protein networks. These representations combine phylogenetic information, DNA-binding properties, and dimerization preference. Beyond summarizing bZIP dimerization preferences within selected species, we have included annotation for a solitary bZIP factor found in the primitive eukaryote, Giardia lamblia, a possible evolutionary precursor to the complex networks of bZIP factors encoded by other genomes. Finally, we discuss the fundamental similarities and differences between dimerization networks within the context of bZIP factor evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available