4.7 Article

Phase-space distributions of chemical abundances in Milky Way-type Galaxy halos

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 646, Issue 2, Pages 886-898

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505131

Keywords

cosmology : theory; galaxies : abundances; galaxies : evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by upcoming data from astrometric and spectroscopic surveys of the Galaxy, we explore the chemical abundance properties and phase-space distributions in hierarchically formed stellar halo simulations set in a Lambda CDM universe. Our stellar halometallicities increase with stellar halo mass. The slope of the [Fe/H]-M-* trend mimics that of the satellite galaxies that were destroyed to build the halos, implying that the relation propagates hierarchically. All simulated halos contain a significant fraction of old stellar populations accreted more than 10 Gyr ago, and in a few cases some intermediate-age populations exist. In contrast with the Milky Way, many of our simulated stellar halos contain old stellar populations that are metal-rich, originating in the early accretion of massive satellites (M-* similar to 10(9) M-circle dot). We suggest that the (metal-rich) stellar halo of M31 falls into this category, while the more metal-poor halo of the Milky Way is lacking in early massive accretion events. Interestingly, our hierarchically formed stellar halos often have nonnegligible metallicity gradients in both [Fe/H] and [alpha/Fe]. These gradients extend a few tens of kiloparsecs, and can be as large as 0.5 dex in [Fe/H] and 0.2 dex in [alpha/Fe], with the most metal-poor halo stars typically buried within the central similar to 5 kpc of the galaxy. Finally, we find that chemical abundances can act as a rough substitute for time of accretion of satellite galaxies, and, based on this finding, we propose a criterion for identifying tidal streams spatially by selecting stars with [alpha/Fe] ratios below solar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available