4.7 Article

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in premature newborns

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 372-379

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl244

Keywords

NONMEM; aminoglycosides; neonates

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin in a population of 200 premature newborns and to investigate the influence of several clinical and physiopathological covariates on the pharmacokinetics of the drug. To validate the pharmacokinetic analysis performed in another population of 50 premature newborns. Methods: A total of 200 premature newborns were evaluated at the neonatal intensive care unit of Severo Ochoa Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Four hundred and seventeen serum drug concentrations were included. Mean gestational age (GA) was 32.19 +/- 2.97 weeks, mean postnatal age (PNA) was 5.49 +/- 5.41 days and mean body weight (BW) was 1.68 +/- 0.63 kg. Fifty additional newborns were studied for validation (mean GA 32.62 +/- 3.07 weeks, mean PNA 5.17 +/- 3.77 days and mean BW 1.80 +/- 0.67 kg). Dosing, serum gentamicin concentrations and 15 covariates were collected. Data analysis was performed with NONMEM. One- and two-compartment open models were evaluated. Four parameters were analysed with the two-compartment open model: clearance (CL), central volume (Vc), peripheral volume (Vp) and intercompartmental clearance (Q). Results and conclusions: The two-compartment open model was found to significantly better describe gentamicin pharmacokinetics in the neonate. More than PNA or GA, creatinine clearance (CLCR) plays an important role in the elimination of gentamicin in premature newborns. Creatinine clearance is also related to GA. The appropriate dosing regimens given in accordance with the characteristics of the patients are 5 mg/kg/48 h and 4 mg/kg/24 or 36 h for neonates < 32 weeks and >= 32 weeks of GA, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available