4.5 Article

Inhibition of mTOR reduces chronic pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1663-1670

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000239304.01496.83

Keywords

fibrosis; hypertrophy; mTOR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective Inhibition of established left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and fibrosis may bring clinical benefits by reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality. The mammalian target of rapamycin, mTOR, is known to play a critical role in determining cell and organ size. We investigated whether mTOR inhibition can inhibit the chronic pressure-overload-induced LVH and fibrosis. Methods Male FVB/N mice underwent transverse aortic constriction (TAC) for 5 weeks to allow for establishment of LVH, followed by treatment with the mTOR inhibitor, Rapamune ( 2 mg/kg per day, gavage), for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was used to monitor changes in LVH and function. Haemodynamic, morphometric, histological and molecular analyses were conducted. Results Inhibition of mTOR by Rapamune was confirmed by a suppression of activated phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 protein and eukaryotic translation initiation factor-4E due to pressure overload. Despite a comparable degree of pressure overload between the vehicle- or Rapamune-treated TAC groups, Rapamune treatment for 4 weeks attenuated TAC-induced LVH by 46%, estimated by LV weight or myocyte size, and LV fractional shortening was also preserved versus vehicle- treated control (39 +/- 1 versus 32 +/- 2%, P < 0.05). Inhibition of established LVH by Rapamune was associated with a 38% reduction in collagen content. Moreover, altered gene expression due to pressure overload was largely restored. Conclusion Despite sustained pressure overload, inhibition of mTOR by a 4-week period of Rapamune treatment attenuates chronically established LVH and cardiac fibrosis with preserved contractile function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available