4.6 Article

Selective prescribing led to overestimation of the benefits of lipid-lowering drugs

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 819-828

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.012

Keywords

aging; bias; confounding variables; hypercholesterolemia; prescriptions; drug; statins

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG18833] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Observational studies have found beneficial effects of lipid-lowering drugs on diverse outcomes, including venous thromboembolism, hip fracture, dementia, and all-cause mortality. Selective use of these drugs in frail people may confound these relationships. Study Design and Setting: We measured 1-year mortality in two cohorts of New Jersey residents, aged 65-99 years, enrolled in state-sponsored drug benefits programs: 112,463 persons hospitalized during the years 1991-1994 and 106,838 nonhospitalized enrollees. Use of lipid-lowering drugs and other medications, as well as diagnoses, were evaluated before follow-up. Results: In age- and sex-adjusted analyses, users of lipid-lowering drugs had a 43% reduced death rate relative to nonusers among hospitalized enrollees and a 56% reduction in the nonhospitalized sample. Available markers of frailty and comorbidity predicted decreased use of these drugs. Control for the propensity to use lipid-lowering drugs attenuated but did not eliminate these effects. After such adjustment, users had a 30% reduction in death rate (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 25%-35%) among hospitalized enrollees and a 41% reduction (95% Cl: 35%-47%) in the nonhospitalized sample. Unmeasured frailty associated with a 26%-33% reduced odds of receiving lipid-lowering therapy could explain this effect. Conclusion: Frailty and comorbidity that influence use of preventive therapies can substantially confound apparent benefits of lipid-lowering drugs on outcomes. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All fights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available