4.6 Article

New kinetic approach to the evolution of polygalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.15) activity in a commercial enzyme preparation under pulsed electric fields

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages E262-E269

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00054.x

Keywords

Bayesian; kinetics; polygalacturonase; pulsed-electric-field; model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of pulsed elecftric fields (PEF) on polygalacturonase (PG) activity in an aqueous solution of a commercial enzyme preparation was studied. Monopolar square wave pulses of 4 mu s were delivered to the solution, which circulated through tubular chambers with 2 stainless steel electrodes in continuous operation. The electric field intensities (E) and treatment time (t) ranged within 15 to 38 kV cm(-1) and 300 to 1100 mu s, respectively. Although important reduction of the PG activity could be achieved (up to 76.5% at E = 38 kV cm(-1) and t = 1100 mu s), the experimental data showed certain enhancemeat of PG activity could be achieved under soft conditions (up to 110.9% at E = 15 kV cm(-1) and t = 300 mu s). A kinetic mechanism involving 2 consecutive irreversible first-order steps was developed to describe and explain the experimental data. The tested model exhibited high accuracy in respect of the experimental data and the error of the model was lower than 4.4%,. The kinetic rate constant of the first (k(1)) and second (k(2)), ratio between the activities of intermediate and native forms of the enzyme (Lambda), and other quantities related to the model, were obtained within a Bayesian framework. k(1) resulted independent of the E applied and considerably greater in magnitude order (k(1) means = 6 mu s(-1)) with respect to k(2), which was dependent on the applied E (mean values ranged from 489-6 mu s(-1) at E = 38 kV cm(-1) to 1215E-6 mu s(-1) at 38 kV cm(-1)). The dependency of k(2) toward E was described using an exponential relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available