4.7 Article

Magnetic resonance imaging of experimental atherosclerotic plaque: Comparison of two ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 388-393

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20649

Keywords

atherosclerosis; magnetic resonance imaging; contrast media; USPIO; animal model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate a new ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) compound, ferumoxytol, as a marker of macrophage activity in atherosclerotic plaques and to compare it to ferumoxtran-10. Materials and Methods: Ten mature heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) female Watanabe rabbits served as the animal model for atherosclerosis, four coeval female New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits were the control group. Five WHHL and two NZW received a single intravenous injection (250 mu mol/kg) of either ferumoxtran-10 or ferumoxytol and were subjected to daily-MR examinations on a 1.5T. whole body scanner for the next five days. Development of signal intensity changes and susceptibility effects was assessed. Statistical analysis was based on a nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-U test, by using a P value at the 0.05 significance level. On day 5, the rabbits were sacrificed and the aorta was referred to histopathology, distribution of iron particles in the vessel wall was analyzed. Results: MRI was feasible in all animals. Three days after injection of ferumoxytol the highest luminal signal,intensity measurements were observed in the ferumoxytol group; the highest measurements were five days after injection in the ferumoxtran- 10 group, (P < 0.05). In the WHHL, susceptibility effects presented as homogeneous dark lines parallel to the aortic wall after ferumoxytol and spotted areas void of signal after ferumoxtran-10. None of these findings were observed in. the NZW control groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available