4.1 Article

The effect of vitamin E on common cold incidence is modified by age, smoking and residential neighborhood

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 332-339

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719543

Keywords

aging; alpha-tocopherol; cities; randomized controlled trial; respiratory infections

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CN-45165, CN-45035] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We have previously found a 28% reduction in common cold incidence with 50 mg/day vitamin E supplementation in a subgroup of the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study cohort: older city-dwelling men (>= 65 years) who smoked only 5-14 cigarettes/day. Objective: To carry out more detailed analyses to explore the modification of vitamin E effect by age, smoking, and residential neighborhood. Methods: We examined the effect of vitamin E on common cold risk in subjects consisting of the placebo and vitamin E arms (n = 14,573) of the ATBC Study, which recruited males aged 50-69 years who smoked >= 5 cigarettes/day at the baseline. The ATBC Study was conducted in southwestern Finland in 1985-1993; the active follow-up lasted for 4.7 years (mean). We modeled common cold risk as a function of age-at-follow-up in the vitamin E arm compared with the placebo arm using linear splines in Poisson regression. Results: In participants of 72 years or older at follow-up, the effect of vitamin E diverged. Among those smoking 5-14 cigarettes per day at baseline and living in cities, vitamin E reduced common cold risk (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.37-0.80), whereas among those smoking more and living away from cities, vitamin E increased common cold risk (RR = 1.58; 1.23-2.01). Conclusions: Vitamin E may cause beneficial or harmful effects on health depending on various modifying factors. Accordingly, caution should be maintained in public health recommendations on vitamin E supplementation until its effects are better understood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available