4.7 Article

One-year soy isoflavone supplementation prevents early postmenopausal bone loss but without a dose-dependent effect

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 509-517

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.01.003

Keywords

postmenopausal women; soy isoflavone; bone mineral density (BMD); bone mineral content (BMC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is believed that soy isoflavone has much potential effectiveness on the postmenopausal status; however, the optimal dose for preventing postmenopausal bone loss still remains unclear. This open-labeled, self-controlled pilot study was undertaken to determine the effect of 1-year supplementation of different high dosages of soy isoflavone in postmenopausal Taiwanese women. Forty-three women aged 45-67 years were enrolled and randomly assigned into a control (C), 100 mg/day isoflavone (IF 100) and 200 mg/day isoflavone (IF200) groups for I year. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and other related biochemical markers of bone metabolism were measured. Results indicated that the decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) was significant for lumbar vertebrae L1-3, L1-4 and the femur neck in the C group; surprisingly, the BMD of L1-3 was significantly elevated in the IF 100 group; however, there were no consistent responses in the IF200 group. No significant change except loss of the bone mineral content of Ward's triangle (P=.003) was found in the IF200 group after treatment. The percentage change at L1-3 was less (P=.04) in the IF200 group when compared to the IF 100 group. A relatively uniform direction of bone formation in expanding the weight and area with different rates of change resulted in different BMD changes. Both indicated a change of bone formation patterns with the higher-dose supplement. A protective effect of IF 100 on estrogen-related bone loss was observed. A lack of a benefit such as high safety in the IF200 group for 1-year administration was ensured and lacked undesirable side effects. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available