4.6 Article

Characterization of patients with an inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis therapy:: the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO)

Journal

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages 531-543

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl073

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Osteoporotic fractures remain a major public health problem. Currently available osteoporosis therapies significantly reduce the risk of fractures, but up to 50% of patients have an inadequate clinical outcome to therapy. Aim: To describe the clinical and quality of life (QOL) of a study population meeting a proposed definition of inadequate clinical outcome to osteoporosis therapy, recruited for the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO). Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Methods: Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis (n = 2314) were divided into Group 1 (those who had previously experienced a fragility fracture despite osteoporosis drug therapy for at least 12 months) (n = 1309, 57%), or Group 2 (those who had previously discontinued osteoporosis drug therapy due to non-compliance or side-effects) (n = 1005; 43%). Baseline clinical characteristics, quality of life (QOL) and osteoporosis/falls risk factors were analysed. Results: The overall population had low BMD (mean +/- SD T-score at lumbar spine -3.1 +/- 1.1), and risk factors for fracture such as previous fractures (67.8%), family history (15.1%), and prolonged glucocorticoid use (17.5%). QOL was poor: total QUALEFFO and EQ-5D scores were 46.8 +/- 18.7, and 0.50 +/- 0.33, respectively. Patients in Group 1 had higher age and body mass index, fewer hours of exercise, more previous fragility fractures and falls, and poorer QOL scores. Discussion: Our definition of inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis drug therapy identifies a severe osteoporosis cohort with poor QOL and increased fracture risk. Using such a definition may lead to earlier recognition of inadequate clinical outcome to osteoporosis therapy, and improved interventions and results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available