4.5 Article

Phenotypic consequences of branch point substitutions

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 803-813

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20362

Keywords

RNA; splicing; 3 ' splice site; transition; transversion; phenotypic severity

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The branch point sequence (BPS) is a conserved splicing signal important for spliceosome assembly and lariat intron formation. BPS mutations may result in aberrant pre-mRNA splicing and genetic disorders, but their phenotypic consequences have been difficult to predict, largely due to a highly degenerate nature of the BPS consensus. Here, we have examined the splicing pattern of nine reporter pre,mRNAs that have previously been shown to give rise to human hereditary diseases as a result of single-nucleotide substitutions in the predicted BPS. Increased exon skipping and intron retention observed in vivo were recapitulated for each mutated pre, mRNA, but the reproducibility of cryptic splice site activation was lower. BP mutations in reporter pre-mRNAs frequently induced aberrant 3' splice sites and also activated a cryptic 5' splice site. Systematic mutagenesis of BP adenosines showed that in most pre-mRNAs, the expression of canonical transcripts was lower for BP transitions than BP transversions. Differential splicing outcome for transitions vs. transversions was abrogated or reduced if introns were truncated to 200 nt or less, suggesting that the nature of the BP residue is less critical for interactions across very short introns. Together, these results improve prediction of phenotypic consequences of point mutations upstream of splice acceptor sites and suggest that the overrepresentation of disease-causing adenosine-to-guanosine BP substitutions observed in Mendelian disorders is due to more profound defects of gene expression at the level of pre,mRNA splicing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available