4.6 Article

Polymorphisms of the inflammatory system and risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 918-923

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER & CO
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.165

Keywords

infection; inflammation; interleukins; polymorphism; stroke; tumor necrosis factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Chronic and acute infections are associated with an increased risk of stroke. The inflammatory response can be influenced by functional polymorphisms in components of the immune system. We hypothesized that these polymorphisms may also modulate the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events. Methods: We determined the frequency of polymorphisms in tumor necrosis factor-alpha [(TNF-alpha) G(-376)A, G(-244)A, G(-238)A, G(-308)A], Toll-like receptor 4 [(TLR4) Gly299Asp and Thr399IIe], interleukin-1-receptor antagonist [(IL-1-RA) intron 2 variable-number tandem repeat], monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 receptor C(-260) T, and interleukin-6 [(IL-6) G(-174) C] genes in 404 patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack before the age of 60 years and in 415 healthy individuals. We also tested for interactions between genotypes, recent febrile episodes and stroke risk. Results: None of the polymorphisms was associated with an increased risk of stroke after adjustment for age and gender. Following multivariate adjustment, carriers of the TNF-alpha (-308) A allele, the IL-1- RA 2* allele or the IL-6 (-174) C allele appeared to have an increased risk of stroke in association with a febrile episode prior to strokes. Conclusion: In our study none of the investigated polymorphisms of the inflammatory system was associated with the risk of acute cerebrovascular events before the age of 60 years. However, post-hoc analyses indicate that some polymorphisms seem to contribute to the risk of stroke in combination with fever.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available