Journal
HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages 283-291Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00418-006-0161-x
Keywords
Phenylhydrazine; Glucose oxidase; Hydrochloric acid; Hydrogen peroxide; Azide
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01-GM70560, R25-GM062460, T32-HL07194]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Many peroxidase inhibitors have been used in horseradish peroxidase (HRP) mediated immunostaining and in situ hybridization to quench background peroxidase activity. However, the efficacy of these inhibitors has been controversial, partially due to the lack of a quantitative study. Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) is much more sensitive than other HRP-mediated methods but its super-sensitivity also demands effective inhibition of background peroxidase activity. In searching for an effective peroxidase inhibitor, we have systematically evaluated the efficacy of several peroxidase inhibitors by quantifying the fluorescence intensity in cultured fibroblasts and tissue sections treated with the inhibitors. For cultured cells, 0.05 mM of phenylhydrazine and 1 unit/ml of glucose oxidase gave only moderate inhibition of HRP activity while 1 mM of sodium azide (NaN(3)), 3% of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), NaN(3)/H(2)O(2) combined and 0.02 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) provided more complete inhibition. However, the inhibitory effect of NaN(3)/H(2)O(2) is reversible upon removal of the inhibitors and followed by incubation and wash to mimic antibody interactions. Similar results were obtained from rat skin wound tissues that have strong endogenous peroxidase activity. Our results recommend the use of HCl and caution the use of phenylhydrazine, glucose oxidase, NaN(3) and H(2)O(2) as potent peroxidase inhibitors.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available